Rules for parsing a sentence. To help the student: do the parsing of the sentence

Parsing a sentence by composition is called syntactic. He is one of the first to be studied in school. At first, the process can be difficult, however, after two analyzes, many people quickly find all the components. Knowledge of parts of speech, rules about the basis and secondary members of a sentence, understanding the connection of words in a phrase will help in parsing. It's coming to an end elementary school, so students in grade 5 perform analysis without difficulty.

Following a simple plan

By following a certain sequence, you can quickly make an analysis. To do this, you need to pay attention to the following steps:

1. Determine what type the phrase belongs to: narrative, interrogative or incentive.
2. According to the emotional color, exclamatory and non-exclamatory sentences are distinguished.
3. Then they move on to grammar. It needs to be found, to indicate the way of expression, to indicate whether the sentence is simple or complex.
4. Determine the one-part and two-part written.
5. Find additional members of the sentence. They will show if it is common or not.
6. With the help of certain types of lines, highlight each minor member of the sentence. At the same time, above the word indicate what kind of member of the sentence it is.
7. Indicate whether there are missing members of the sentence in the proposed phrase, which will determine whether the statement is complete or incomplete.
8. Are there any complications?
9. Describe what is written.
10. Make a diagram.

To correctly and quickly parse, you need to know what the stem and minor members are.

The foundation

Every stem has a subject and a predicate. When parsing, the first word is underlined with one line, the second - with two. For example, " The night has come". Here the grammatical basis is the full phrase. It has the subject word "night". The subject cannot be in any other case than the nominative.

In the neighborhood is the predicate "came", which describes the action performed with the subject. (Dawn has come. Autumn has come.) Depending on whether the sentence is simple or complex, one or two bases are distinguished. In the statement "Yellow leaves fall from the trees" there is one grammatical basis. And here are two basics: "The moon hid - the morning has come."

Before parsing phrases, you need to find additional members of the sentence:

1. Most often, the object is a noun or a pronoun. Prepositions can be added to the second member of the sentence. It answers all questions of cases. This does not include the nominative case, since only the subject can have it. Look (where?) At the sky. Let's discuss the (what?) question. In semantic meaning, they are on the same level as the noun.
2. The definition performs a descriptive function, answering the question "Which? Whose?". It is often difficult to identify a member of a sentence due to the fact that it can be of two types. Agreed when two words are in the same person, gender, number and case. Inconsistent acts as a phrase with control and adjacency. For example: "There is a bookshelf on the wall. There is a bookshelf on the wall". In both cases, one can ask the question: which one? However, the difference is the consistency and inconsistency of the definition.
3. The circumstance describes the manner of action, the time. It is considered the most extensive member of the proposal. We met (where?) at the store. (When?) We went to the cinema yesterday. I (how?) will easily do the exercise. This leads to the fact that the circumstance is often confused with the addition. Here it is important to correctly put the question from the main word to the dependent.

Relationship while writing

It is important to say that all minor members are necessarily associated with one of the main words. The definition is part of the subject, so questions are asked from this member of the sentence. But the addition and circumstance are connected with the predicate.

When parsing, the secondary members should be indicated on the letter. If the subject and predicate are underlined with one and two lines, respectively, then the addition is highlighted with a dotted line, the definition with a wavy line, the circumstance with a dot and a dash. When parsing, it is necessary to indicate in a graphical version what each word is.

Practical lesson

Consider a simple sentence:

In winter, tourists go to ski resort.

Start from the basics. Here it is represented by the phrase "tourists are leaving." That is, the subject is tourists, the predicate is sent. This is the only basis, so what is written is a simple statement. Since there are additional members, it is common.

Now you can start looking for add-ons. It was not used here when writing. It is followed by a definition: to (which?) ski resort. And you can highlight the circumstances. They go (where?) to the resort, they go (when?) in winter.

This is how the sentence looks like when parsed by composition: In winter (obst.) tourists (subl.) go (sk.) to a ski (def.) resort (add.).

Complex sentence example:

The sun went behind a cloud, a light rain fell from the sky.

First we look for the base. The sentence is about sun and rain. So, there are two bases in the sentence: the sun has set, and the rain has begun. Now we need to find additional members of the sentence in each basis. Went (where?) behind a cloud; went (what?) small, went (where?) from the sky.

This is how you need to parse common sentences by composition:

The boy sat on the roof of the house and looked at the starry sky, attracting the eye.

(Descriptive, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, common, complete, complicated by homogeneous predicates and a separate definition, expressed by participial turnover).

Here the basis is - the boy sat and watched, therefore there are two predicates. We find the secondary members of the sentence. Sat (where?) on the roof (what?) of the house. He looked (where?) at the sky, (what?) starry. The sky (what?), eye-catching.

That is, after finding all the components of the statement, it will look like this:

The boy (subl.) sat (sk.) on the roof (obst.) of the house (adv.) and looked (sk.) at the starry (def.) sky (obst.), attracting the eye (def.).

Syntactic parsing of a sentence is easy to do. The main thing is to follow the steps, starting with the search for the main members of the proposal. They are the foundation. Then they move on to secondary ones. At the end of the analysis, each of them is underlined with a certain line.

Video

From the video you will learn how to properly parse a sentence.

The sentence contains information, asks about it, or directs to action. Most often it has a basis and secondary members describing it. To understand or refresh the memory of a topic, it is useful to study examples. grammar parsing sentences in Russian.

Grammatical basis in parsing a sentence

The basis is quite logical in application. It consists of a subject that directly names a thing or phenomenon, and a predicate - an action performed or directed at an object.

The subject is always used in the initial form (nominative), but can be not only a noun. It could be:

• numeral - to indicate quantity, set, number (there were three in line; four was his best estimate);
• personal pronoun (he quietly walked along the corridor; we left the classroom);
• indefinite pronoun (someone was sitting in the room; something bothered me);
• negative pronoun (no one could stop them);
• adjective in the sense of a noun (the person in charge was appointed by the management; the duty officer kept order).

In the grammatical analysis of a sentence, it is customary to highlight the subject with an underline, and the predicate with a double underline.

The predicate is most often a verb, but has several types:

• simple verb, expressed by the verb in any mood (the dog ran down the alley; the student gets up early);
• compound verb, consists of an auxiliary verb (modal word) and an infinitive (she started running in the morning; I have to go to work);
• compound nominal, having a linking verb (most often - to be) and a nominal part (a student became a student; bread is their main food; three times two is six(the word "will" is omitted);

Completeness of the offer

Based on the composition of the basis, sentences are two-part, where both main members are present or one is implied (incomplete) (night has come; where is he(omitted "is") ?) , and one-part. The latter are:

• definitely personal, in which it is clear from the face of the verb who it is about (I do my best(I); let's go for a walk(we));
• indefinitely personal, expressed by the past tense verb in the plural (a floor below made a noise; somewhere in the distance they sang);
• generalized-personal, which attribute the action to everyone (often found in proverbs and sayings) (if you want to eat a fish, you need to climb into the water; you go and admire the view);
• impersonal, implying no object (it got dark; he was very sorry; it was cold in the room).

Secondary, but no less important

To give detailed information, the object and action are supported by third-party words and constructions. They are:

When performing a grammatical analysis of a sentence, they must also be taken into account. If there are minor members, the proposal is considered widespread, respectively, without them - non-common.

Complicated sentences - it's not difficult at all

Various plug-in components complete the offer by increasing the amount of information. They are embedded between the main and secondary members, but are already defined as a separate part, which goes as a separate paragraph in the grammatical analysis of the sentence. These components can be removed or replaced without losing the meaning of the text. Among them:

• separate definitions applicable to an object member (describe a property, stand out as a definition), are participial phrases (the kettle, which was warming on the stove, whistled sharply; the road led to a house standing in the forest);
• isolated circumstances (highlighted as a circumstance) are adverbial phrases (he ran, stumbling over stones; looking wary, the dog held out its paw);
• homogeneous members of a sentence - perform the same function and always ask the same question (were scattered on the floor(what?) books, notebooks, notes(homogeneous subject); on weekends we only(what they were doing?) sleeping and walking(homogeneous predicate); he looked at(whom?) mother and sister(homogeneous addition));
• address to someone, which is always separated by a comma and is an independent member of the sentence (my son, you did the right thing; You, Andrei, misunderstood me);
• introductory words (probably, perhaps, finally, etc.) (I probably got excited; tomorrow, most likely, it will be hot).

How to make a grammatical analysis of a sentence, taking into account all the components?

For parsing, a clear algorithm has been created that does not cause difficulties if you know all the above constructions and components of the proposal. Among them, simple and complex ones stand out - the order of analysis is slightly different for them. The following is a grammatical analysis of sentences with examples for individual cases.

Simple sentence

At the beginning of autumn, covered with a golden carpet, the city alleys whimsically shimmer.

1. Define the main members. The basis should be one, as in this example: alleys- subject, shimmer- predicate.

2. Select minor members: (when?) at the beginning of autumn- circumstance (what?) covered with golden carpet- separate definition, (how?) whimsically- circumstance (what?) urban- definition.

3. Define parts of speech:

At the beginning of the noun. autumn n. , covered with golden adj. carpet n. , bizarrely overflow urban adj. alleys n.

4. Describe the signs:

• the purpose of the statement (narrative, incentive, interrogative);
• intonation (exclamatory, non-exclamatory);
• on the basis (two-part, one-part - indicate which one);
• completeness (complete, incomplete)
• by the presence of secondary (common, non-common);
• complicated (if yes, then by what) or not complicated;

The characteristic of this is non-exclamatory, two-part, complete, widespread, complicated by a separate definition.

This is what a complete grammatical analysis of a sentence looks like.

Difficult sentence

Since a complex sentence includes two or more simple ones, it is quite logical to parse them separately, but the parsing algorithm is still different. The grammatical analysis of a sentence in Russian is ambiguous. Compound sentences related to simple ones are:

An example of parsing a compound sentence

In the family, regardless of age, everyone was very busy, but on weekends everyone got together for one big table.

1. All bases are highlighted. There are several of them in complex sentence: each- subject, been busy- compound nominal predicate; all- subject, were going- predicate.
2. Define parts of speech.

In the pr. family, noun. , regardless of from pr. age n. , each is a place. was ch. very nar. busy app. , nose. on pr. weekend adj. all place. were going to for pr. large adj. table su sch.

1. Find out if there is an alliance. Here - "but". So the proposal is allied.
2. It is possible to characterize by the position of simple ones if there is a union (paragraph 2). This example is a compound sentence, the simple ones are equivalent in it (that is, if you wish, you can divide it into two independent ones). In the case of non-union, this item is not indicated.
3. Do general characteristics: narrative, non-exclamatory, complex, allied, compound.
4. Disassemble simple inside separately:

• in the family, regardless of age, everyone was very busy (narrative, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, full, common, complicated by a separate definition of "regardless of age")a
• on weekends everyone gathered at a large table

Complex sentence

The algorithm will be similar, only with the indication of the subordinating union. It is also part of the composition. You also need to highlight the main thing and find out how the subordinate clauses (parentheses) are “attached” to it.

This is a kind of submission, not a mandatory item, but it is also often taken into account.

The main thing to remember is that grammatical and syntactic analysis are synonyms. The meeting of one of the words in the task should not be frightening, since the topic is quite general and quickly digestible. For foreigners, it is difficult because of the great variability, but that's what makes the Russian language beautiful.

Parsing simple sentence firmly established in the practice of elementary and secondary schools. This is the most difficult and voluminous type of grammatical analysis. It includes a description and scheme of the sentence, analysis by members, indicating the parts of speech.

The structure and meaning of a simple sentence is studied starting from grade 5. The full set of features of a simple sentence is indicated in the 8th grade, and in the 9th grade the focus is on complex sentences.

In this type of analysis, the levels of morphology and syntax are correlated: the student must be able to identify parts of speech, recognize their forms, find conjunctions, understand the ways of connecting words in a phrase, know the signs of the main and secondary members of a sentence.

Let's start with the simplest: we will help the guys prepare for parsing in 5th grade. In elementary school, the student memorizes the sequence of analysis and performs it at an elementary level, indicating the grammatical basis, syntactic relationships between words, the type of sentence in terms of the composition and purpose of the statement, learns to draw up diagrams and find homogeneous members.

The elementary school uses different programs in the Russian language, so the level of requirements and preparation of students are different. In the fifth grade, I accepted children who studied in elementary school according to the programs of the educational system "School 2100", "School of Russia" and "Elementary School of the 21st Century". There are big differences. Primary school teachers do a tremendous job to compensate for the shortcomings of their textbooks, and themselves "lay" successive links between elementary and secondary schools.

In the 5th grade, the material for parsing the proposal is generalized, expanded and built into more full form, in grades 6-7 it is improved taking into account the newly studied morphological units (verbal forms: participle and gerund; adverb and category of state; service words: prepositions, conjunctions and particles).

Let's use examples to show the differences between the level of requirements in the format of parsing.

In 4th grade	In 5th grade
In a simple sentence, the grammatical basis is highlighted, familiar parts of speech are indicated above the words, homogeneous members are emphasized, phrases are written out or syntactic links between words are drawn. Scheme: [O -, O]. Narrative, non-exclamatory, simple, common, with homogeneous predicates. Exist. (main word) + adj., Ch. (main word) + noun. Ch. (main word) + places. Adverb + ch. (main word)	Syntactic links are not drawn, phrases are not written out, the scheme and basic designations are the same, but the characteristics are different: narrative, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, common, complicated by homogeneous predicates. Parsing is constantly practiced in the classroom and participates in the grammar tasks of control dictations.
In a complex sentence, grammatical foundations are emphasized, parts are numbered, familiar parts of speech are signed above the words, the type is indicated according to the purpose of the statement and emotional coloring, according to the composition and presence of secondary members. Parsing scheme: [O and O] 1 , 2 , and 3 . Narrative, non-exclamatory, complex, common.	The scheme remains the same, but the characteristic is different: narrative, non-exclamatory, complex, consists of 3 parts that are connected by an allied and allied connection, in 1 part there are homogeneous members, all parts are two-part and common. Parsing a complex sentence in grade 5 is educational in nature and is not a means of control.
Sentence schemes with direct speech: A: "P!" or "P," - a. The concept of quotation is introduced, which coincides in design with direct speech.	The schemes are supplemented by a break in direct speech with the words of the author: "P, - a. - P." and "P, - a, - p". The concept of dialogue and ways of its design are introduced. Schemes are made up, but the characteristics of sentences with direct speech are not made.

Plan for parsing a simple sentence

1. Determine the type of sentence according to the purpose of the statement (narrative, interrogative, incentive).

2. Find out the type of sentence by emotional coloring (non-exclamatory or exclamatory).

3. Find the grammatical basis of the sentence, underline it and indicate the ways of expression, indicate that the sentence is simple.

4. Determine the composition of the main members of the proposal (two-part or one-part).

5. Determine the presence of minor members (common or non-common).

6. Underline the secondary members of the sentence, indicate the ways of their expression (parts of speech): from the composition of the subject and the composition of the predicate.

7. Determine the presence of missing members of the proposal (complete or incomplete).

8. Determine the presence of complications (complicated or not complicated).

9. Write down the characteristics of the proposal.

10. Draw up a proposal scheme.

For analysis, we used sentences from the beautiful fairy tales of Sergei Kozlov about the Hedgehog and the Bear cub.

1) It was an extraordinary autumn day!

2) Everyone's duty is to work.

3) Thirty mosquitoes ran out into the clearing and played their squeaky violins.

4) He has no father, no mother, no Hedgehog, no Bear cub.

5) And Squirrel took nuts and a cup and hurried after.

6) And they put things in a basket: mushrooms, honey, a kettle, cups - and went to the river.

7) And pine needles, and fir cones, and even cobwebs - they all straightened up, smiled and sang with all their might the last autumn song of the grass.

8) The Hedgehog lay, covered up to the very nose with a blanket, and looked at the Bear Cub with quiet eyes.

9) The hedgehog sat on a hill under a pine tree and looked at the illuminated moonlight valley flooded with fog.

10) Across the river, blazing with aspens, the forest darkened.

11) So until the evening they ran, jumped, jumped off a cliff and yelled at the top of their lungs, emphasizing the stillness and silence of the autumn forest.

12) And he jumped like a real kangaroo.

13) Water, where are you running?

14) Maybe he's crazy?

15) It seems to me that he imagined himself ... as the wind.

Examples of Parsing Simple Sentences

Today we continue to study a complex sentence, in this lesson we will learn how to parse it.

1. Determine the type of sentence according to the purpose of the statement ( narrative, interrogative, imperative).

2. Determine the type of sentence by intonation ( exclamatory, non-exclamatory).

3. Select simple sentences as part of a complex one, determine their foundations.

4. Determine the means of communication of simple sentences in a complex one ( allied, non-union).

5. Select minor members in each part of a complex sentence, indicate whether it is common or non-common.

6. Note the presence of homogeneous members or treatment.

Proposal 1 (Fig. 1).

Rice. 1. Offer 1

The sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, complex (has two grammatical bases), allied (connected by the union and), and the first and second parts are uncommon (Fig. 2).

Rice. 2. Analysis of sentence 1

Proposition 2 (Fig. 3).

Rice. 3. Offer 2

The sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, complex, non-union. The first part is widespread (there is a definition), the second is not common (Fig. 4).

Rice. 4. Analysis of sentence 2

Perform syntactic analysis of the sentence (Fig. 5).

Rice. 5. Offer

The sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, complex, allied. The first part is common, complicated by homogeneous predicates. The second part is common.

Rice. 6. Analysis of the offer

Bibliography

1. Russian language. Grade 5 In 3 parts Lvov S.I., Lvov V.V. 9th ed., revised. - M.: 2012 Part 1 - 182 p., Part 2 - 167 p., Part 3 - 63 p.

2. Russian language. Grade 5 Tutorial in 2 parts. Ladyzhenskaya T.A., Baranov M.T., Trostentsova L.A. and others - M.: Enlightenment, 2012. - Part 1 - 192 p.; Part 2 - 176 p.

3. Russian language. Grade 5 Textbook / Ed. Razumovskaya M.M., Lekanta P.A. - M.: 2012 - 318 p.

4. Russian language. Grade 5 Textbook in 2 parts Rybchenkova L.M. and others - M .: Education, 2014. - Part 1 - 127 p., Part 2 - 160 p.

1. Website of the festival of pedagogical ideas "Open Lesson" ()

Homework

1. What is the order of parsing a complex sentence?

2. What are the complex sentences for the means of communication between the parts?

3. Underline the grammatical foundations in the sentence:

The hurried dawn was approaching, the heavenly heights brightened.

1. Describe the sentence according to the purpose of the statement: narrative, interrogative or incentive.
2. By emotional coloring: exclamatory or non-exclamatory.
3. By the presence of grammatical foundations: simple or complex.
4. Then, depending on whether the sentence is simple or complex:

If simple: 5. Describe the sentence by the presence of the main members of the sentence: two-part or one-part, indicate which main member of the sentence, if it is one-part (subject or predicate). 6. Characterize by the presence of secondary members of the proposal: common or non-common. 7. Indicate whether the sentence is complicated by anything (homogeneous members, appeal, introductory words) or not complicated. 8. Underline all members of the sentence, indicate parts of speech. 9. Draw up a sentence outline, indicating the grammatical basis and complication, if any.

If complex: 5. Indicate which connection is in the proposal: allied or non-union. 6. Indicate what is the means of communication in the sentence: intonation, coordinating conjunctions or subordinating conjunctions. 7. Conclude what kind of sentence this is: unionless (BSP), compound (CSP), complex (CSP). 8. Parse each part of a complex sentence as a simple one, starting from point No. 5 of the adjacent column. 9. Underline all members of the sentence, indicate parts of speech. 10. Draw up a sentence outline, indicating the grammatical basis and complication, if any.

An example of parsing a simple sentence

Oral analysis:

The sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, grammatical basis: pupils and pupils study, common, complicated by homogeneous subjects.

Writing:

Narrative, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, grammatical stem pupils and pupils study, common, complicated by homogeneous subjects.

An example of parsing a complex sentence

Oral analysis:

The sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, complex, allied connection, means of communication subordinating conjunction because, a complex sentence. The first simple sentence: one-part, with the main member - the predicate did not ask common, not complicated. Second simple sentence: two-part, grammatical basis we went with the class, common, uncomplicated.

Writing:

Narrative, non-exclamatory, complex, allied connection, subordinating union means of communication because, SPP.

1st PP: one-part, with the main member - the predicate did not ask common, not complicated.

2nd PP: two-part, grammatical basis - we went with the class, spread, not complicated.

Schematic example (sentence followed by schema)

Another option for parsing

Syntax parsing. Order in parsing.

In phrases:

1. Select the correct phrase from the sentence.
2. We consider the structure - we highlight the main word and the dependent. We indicate what part of speech is the main and dependent word. Next, we indicate in what syntactic way this phrase is connected.
3. And finally, we denote what its grammatical meaning is.

In a simple sentence:

1. We determine what the sentence is for the purpose of the statement - narrative, incentive or interrogative.
2. We find the basis of the sentence, we establish that the sentence is simple.
3. Next, you need to talk about how this proposal is built.
   • It is two-part or one-part. If it is one-part, then determine the type: personal, impersonal, nominative or indefinitely personal.
   • Common or non-common
   • incomplete or complete. If the sentence is incomplete, then it is necessary to indicate which member of the sentence is missing in it.
4. If this proposal is complicated in any way, whether it be homogeneous members or isolated members of the proposal, this must be noted.
5. Next, you need to analyze the sentence by members, while indicating what parts of speech they are. It is important to follow the order of parsing. First, the predicate and the subject are determined, then the secondary ones, which are part of the first - the subject, then - the predicate.
6. We explain why one way or another punctuation marks are placed in the sentence.

Predicate

1. We note what the predicate is - a simple verb or compound (nominal or verbal).
2. Specify how the predicate is expressed:
   • simple - what form of the verb;
   • compound verb - what it consists of;
   • compound nominal - what connection is used, how the nominal part is expressed.

In a sentence that has homogeneous members.

If we have a simple sentence, then when parsing it, it should be noted what kind of homogeneous members of the sentence are and how they are related to each other. Either through intonation, or intonation with conjunctions.

In sentences with separate members:

If we have a simple sentence, then when parsing it, it should be noted what the turnover will be. Next, we analyze the words that are included in this turnover by the members of the sentence.

In sentences with isolated members of speech:

First, we note that in this sentence, there is a direct speech. We indicate the direct speech and the text of the author. We analyze, explain why punctuation marks are placed in the sentence in this way and not otherwise. We draw the scheme of the offer.

In a compound sentence:

First, we indicate which sentence for the purpose of the statement is interrogative, declarative or incentive. We find simple sentences in the sentence, we single out the grammatical basis in them.

We find unions with the help of which simple sentences are connected in a complex one. We note what kind of unions they are - adversative, connecting or dividing. We determine the meaning of this entire compound sentence - opposition, alternation or enumeration. We explain why punctuation marks are placed in the sentence in this way. Then each simple sentence that makes up the complex one must be parsed in the same way as a simple sentence is parsed.

In a complex sentence with a subordinate clause (one)

First, we indicate what the sentence is in terms of the purpose of the statement. We single out the grammatical basis of all simple sentences that make up a complex one. Let's read them.

We name which sentence is the main one, and which is subordinate. We explain what kind of complex sentence it is, pay attention to how it is built, how the subordinate clause to the main clause is connected and what it refers to.

We explain why the punctuation marks in this sentence are arranged in this way. Then, the subordinate and main clauses must be parsed, in the same way as simple sentences are parsed.

In a complex sentence with subordinate clauses (several)

We call what the sentence is according to the purpose of the statement. We single out the grammatical basis of all the simple sentences that make up the complex one, and read them out. We indicate which sentence is the main one, and which is subordinate. It is necessary to indicate what the subordination in the sentence is - either it is a parallel subordination, or sequential, or homogeneous. If there is a combination of several types of subordination, this should be noted. We explain why, in this way, punctuation marks are placed in the sentence. And, at the end, we analyze the subordinate and main clauses as simple sentences.

In a complex non-union sentence:

We call what the sentence is according to the purpose of the statement. We find the grammatical basis of all simple sentences that make up this complex sentence. We read them out, call the number of simple sentences that make up the complex one. We determine what the meaning is the relationship between simple sentences. It can be - sequence, cause with effect, opposition, simultaneity, explanation or addition.

We note what are the features of the structure of this sentence, what kind of complex sentence it is. How are simple words connected in this sentence and what do they refer to.

We explain why punctuation marks are placed in the sentence in this way.

In a complex sentence in which there are different types of communication.

We call what, according to the purpose of the statement, this sentence is. We find and highlight the grammatical basis of all simple sentences that make up a complex one, read them out. We establish that this proposal will be a proposal in which there are different types connections. Why? We determine what connections are present in this sentence - allied coordinating, subordinating, or any other.

According to the meaning, we establish how simple ones are formed in a complex sentence. We explain why punctuation marks are placed in the sentence in this way. We analyze all simple sentences that make up a complex one in the same way as a simple sentence is parsed.

All for study » Russian language » Parsing of a sentence

To bookmark a page, press Ctrl+D.

Link: https://site/russkij-yazyk/sintaksicheskij-razbor