In Vysotsky, I don't like analysis. Composition “I never get tired of life ...” (analysis of the poem “I don’t love”)

Mikhail Yurievich Lermontov is a famous poet and prose writer. All his works are filled with liveliness, all his characters are multifaceted and interesting. The same can be said about his poems. They are full of emotions, they are versatile, they open the inner world of the creator. His works are included in the school curriculum, starting from high school. Novels, poems, stories of Mikhail Yurievich are read and studied not only in our country, but also abroad.

In 1830, the poet met Ekaterina Sushkova. Sixteen-year-old Mikhail immediately falls in love with her. Unfortunately, his lover did not have any romantic feelings for him, even more so, she gave him the following characterization:

A clumsy, clumsy boy with intelligent, expressive eyes and a sarcastically mocking smile.

After some time, they had to part for four whole years. In 1831, Mikhail Lermontov wrote this poem and dedicated it to Catherine. He cruelly avenged his outraged love when he upset the girl's engagement, convincing her that the famous writer, that is, he himself, was still crazy about her.

Genre, direction and size

Lermontov's work is characterized by multi-genre. He writes in absolutely any direction, skillfully combining in his works the love of nature, smart and interesting reasoning, which are not devoid of warmth. This work just refers to the love lyrics of the poet.

"I don't love you" is written in iambic tetrameter. Rhyme cross. In general, this is not the first experience of Mikhail Yurievich in this subject. On the theme of love for a lifetime, the writer wrote about 160 poems.

Images and symbols

The lyrical hero is the writer himself. He compares his heart and soul to a temple. The image of the beloved is a deity. It warms the temple with its radiance.

The hero of the poem suffers, it is hard for him, but at the end he admits that, despite all the suffering, his soul and heart still remain a temple for this deity, and it itself will always be something special for him.

Themes and mood

The poet touches on the theme of the experiences of a man in love. In this short poem, Mikhail Yuryevich fit all the conflicting thoughts that arise in a man who has parted with his beloved. On the one hand, he is sad, he seems to have forgotten about his feelings, but on the other hand, he is offended and unpleasant that it all ended with him being forced to suppress his love.

Of course, the main theme is unrequited love and subsequent separation, which will forever remain a scar on the heart. But the lyrical hero cannot be angry and hate, he will never throw his idol off the pedestal.

This poem is like a farewell letter in which he says that he had a hard time, but he managed and forgot his love, he had to break himself. It's over, but the aftertaste of a broken heart still remains.

Idea

In this poem, Mikhail Lermontov conveys his feelings. He splashes them out in verse in order to free his soul and heart from experiences, to clear his thoughts from the memory of ex-lover. But still, she is still the meaning of his life, no matter how much he wants the opposite. Such passion does not disappear, but simply lurks in the soul, like a dormant volcano.

The poet was very loving, which is quite typical for creative individuals (they need a muse). But in his poems his love is always sad. The affair with Sushkova was quite interesting, since in it Lermontov at first could not achieve her location, and then cruelly deceived his beloved. This poem is only a small drop in the love lyrics dedicated to Sushkova. “I don’t love you” can be called a poem that completes the author’s love epic, so the main idea is to sound the last chord of the passion melody that the creator leads to the end.

Means of artistic expression

At first glance, it seems that the poem does not have any special means of expression, but if you analyze it in more detail, you can find metaphors: “the image is alive, although powerless”; personification: "dream sped away"; epithets: "the former dream", "defeated idol", "abandoned temple".

There is also an inversion. Due to this, the work has a more interesting sound. In general, this poem is not great, but the author combines all the words so harmoniously that it immediately takes over the soul.

Interesting? Save it on your wall!

I do not like your irony analysis of Nekrasov's poem according to plan

1. History of creation. The work "I do not like your irony" (1850) N. Nekrasov dedicated to his common-law wife - A. Panaeva. Probably, due to the deep intimacy, the poem was published only in 1855 (the magazine Sovremennik).

2. Genre of the poem- love lyrics.

3. Main theme works - the inevitable extinction of love feelings. Nekrasov lived with his beloved and her lawful husband, Ivan Panaev. This strange "love triangle" endlessly surprised and shocked Petersburg society. The poet was openly laughed at. Nekrasov was very worried about his uncertain position. He understood that in this form relations with Panaeva could not be strong.

The poet often had fits of furious jealousy, leading to quarrels and scandals. Panaeva treated Nekrasov's torment with irony, as stated in the very title of the poem. The poet imploringly urges his beloved not to forget about her past passion ("who loved so dearly"). For him, the memory of a happy past remains the key to continuing the relationship.

Nekrasov feels that not all is lost. Beloved behaves "shyly and gently", as if on a very first date. The soul of the poet himself is overwhelmed with "jealous anxieties and dreams." At the same time, the author understands that very soon the strange couple will still have to part. His only request to his beloved is to delay the "inevitable denouement" for as long as possible.

The lyrical hero compares the fading love with the "last thirst". Behind the stormy manifestation of sensual passion, there is a "secret coldness and longing" in the hearts. The poet uses an even more vivid image - an autumn stormy river with icy water.

4. Composition of the poem consistent.

5. The size of the work- iambic pentameter with broken rhythm. Rhyming is mixed: ring, cross and adjacent.

6. Expressive means. The suffering of the lyrical hero is emphasized by negative epithets: "jealous", "inevitable", "last". They are opposed by epithets in the form of adverbs: "hotly", "shyly and tenderly". The whole work as a whole is built on the opposition: "obsolete and unlived" - "loved", "dreams" - "denouement", "turbulent river" - "colder ... waves".

Significant emotional tension is contained in metaphors (“anxieties and dreams are boiling”, “last thirst”) and comparison of love with a stormy river. The first two stanzas are a direct appeal of the lyrical hero to his beloved woman ("leave her", "you wish").

The deeply personal nature of this address is reinforced by exclamations. In the last stanza, the author comes to terms with the future "inevitable denouement". Prayers are replaced by a sad summing up. The dots resemble the forced pauses between the sobs of the lyrical hero.

7. Main idea poems - love, unfortunately, is not eternal. Even the strongest passion will cool over the years. Anticipating parting, lovers should take advantage of every minute of the feeling that gradually burns out.

I don't like fatal outcome

I never get tired of life.

I don't like any season

When I don't sing happy songs.

I don't like cold cynicism

I do not believe in enthusiasm, and yet -

When a stranger reads my letters,

Looking over my shoulder.

I don't like when - half

Or when they interrupted the conversation.

I don't like being shot in the back

I am also against point blank shots.

I hate version gossip

Worms of doubt, honor the needle,

Or when it's against the grain all the time

Or when with iron on glass.

I don't like well-fed confidence

It's better to let the brakes fail.

I'm annoyed when the word "honor" is forgotten

And if in honor slander behind the eyes.

When I see broken wings

There is no pity in me - and for good reason:

I do not like violence and impotence,

That's just a pity for the crucified Christ.

I don't like myself when I'm shaking

And I can't stand it when the innocent are beaten.

I do not like it when they climb into my soul,

Especially when they spit on it.

I do not like arenas and arenas:

They change a million rubles for them.

Let there be big changes ahead -

I will never love it!

The history of the creation of the poem "I do not love", in my opinion, is very curious. According to the poet Alexei Uklein, while in Paris, Vysotsky somehow open window I heard Boris Poloskin's song "I Love", which for some reason was considered not his original work, but only a translation of either Charles Aznavour's song or folk French (both options coexisted). Probably because it is based on love for a woman, an intimate feeling, dedication to which poems in the sixties, although not forbidden, was still not very welcomed. Here is the glorification of civil feelings, patriotism, the glorification of the party and the people - much more important topics. This was so firmly hammered into the consciousness of the Soviet people that even Vysotsky did not agree with Poloskin - I quote from Uklein's note:

- Lenin once said to Gorky: “I often can’t listen to music, it gets on my nerves, I want to say cute nonsense and stroke people’s heads ... And today you can’t stroke anyone on the head - they’ll bite off your hand, and you have to hit on the heads, hit ruthlessly . you don't live in the city brotherly love, and in Leningrad - the cradle of the revolution ...

As we can see, the 30-year-old Vysotsky, it was 1968, was also affected by the system of Soviet school education, according to which everything personal is something secondary, not deserving special attention. His original response to Poloskin was the poem-song "I don't love."

Naturally, Vysotsky moved away from intimate topics and expressed his life credo, his position, according to which he does not accept something, not only does not want to put up with something, but cannot, because his poet’s soul rebels against this denied. Before naming this denied, I note: I would classify the poem “I don’t love” as a civil-philosophical lyric. To the first, because the author openly expresses his civic position (or, as we were taught at school, the position of a lyrical hero); to the second, because many of the provisions of this poem can be understood both in a direct and in a figurative, broader sense. For example, the phrase "the brakes will fail" only in an inexperienced reader will evoke memories of a car, of brakes that may turn out to be faulty. Many will think about the endless race of life, think about what to rush along life path extremely dangerous, because the failure of the brakes here can lead to the most disastrous results, and about how great the hatred of the lyrical hero is for the “well-fed confidence” that it is better for him to rush through life without brakes.

The theme of the poem is stated in the title, and since rejection concerns many areas of human life (many micro-topics), it is not possible to define the theme more specifically, in my opinion. And yet, I would say that the theme of rejection of philistinism with its double morality is clearly visible in the poem - and there is absolutely nothing revolutionary, although Vysotsky reminds the singer of love with his remark about disagreeing with Boris that Leningrad is the cradle of the revolution. The idea of ​​the poem stems from the theme - to cause rejection of what the lyrical hero does not accept. The poem is plotless, so there is no need to talk about the elements of the plot composition.

The lyrical hero, based on the text of the work, seems to be a young, energetic, decent person, a person for whom honor is not an empty word, for whom a song, the ability to sing is the main thing in life, a person who openly expresses his life position, having his own opinion, but in real life somewhat closed, far from letting everyone into the soul. The poem strikes with dynamism, inexhaustible energy, which is transmitted to the reader (listener). Both the high emotional intensity of the work, and the energy with which the lyrical hero introduces us to the main provisions of his life credo, are quite appropriate, because without heat, without energy, talking about the denied, the unacceptable would be unconvincing.

At first glance, the poem is not rich in means of artistic expression, but at first glance, in fact, they are quite enough here to create capacious negative images, and for brightness, dynamism of presentation. The speech of V.V. Vysotsky as a whole is metaphorical, full of images.

First of all, probably, every reader pays attention to the anaphora “I don’t love”, which opens most of the stanzas, which sounds twice in one stanza, and only the third line begins in one - in the fourth stanza, the initial “I don’t love” is replaced by more strong "I hate." Such asymmetry is one of the means that gives the poem dynamism, as it changes its intonation: instead of the already familiar “I don’t love”, suddenly “I hate”, then “I don’t love” is replaced by the beginning “When I see” and in the last three in stanzas, a four-fold anaphora “I don’t love”, ending with a categorical “I will never love this” - an element that ends the poem in a peculiar way, giving its composition an annular appearance.

To complete the conversation about poetic syntax, since it began with the mention of anaphora, I note the presence of a few inversions - they are in the subordinate part of complex sentences: “When I don’t sing cheerful songs”, “When a stranger reads my letters”, “when innocents are beaten”, “when spit on her." Inversion is always expressive, as it sticks out, inserts into the fore those words that violate the direct word order: cheerful songs, mine, innocent, in it.

Antithesis is another technique (along with anaphora) that underlies the construction of some stanzas, however, I note: Vysotsky in this poem builds it on contextual antonyms: “I don’t like open cynicism, / I don’t believe in enthusiasm ...”, “I I don’t like it when they shoot in the back, / I’m also against point-blank shots”, “I don’t like ** violence and impotence, - / That’s just a pity for the crucified Christ”, “I don’t like it when ** climb into my soul, / Especially when they spit on it.”

Tropes give special expressiveness to the poem, although there are few of them, first of all - epithets that give bulge to abstract and concrete concepts, making these concepts bright: cheerful songs, open cynicism, well-fed confidence, broken wings.

There are practically no metaphors, I would attribute the phrases “honor the needle”, “broken wings” to this technique. Although not everything is clear.

The first - "honor the needle" - reminds us of Lermontov's "crown of thorns, entwined with laurels" ("The Death of a Poet"), so it can be called an allusion. At the same time, in this metaphor of Vysotsky, I also see signs of an oxymoron: honors in our view are recognition of merit, triumph, honoring with applause or without them, with awards, crowns, laurel wreaths and without them. The needle of honors is a connection of the incompatible ... but - here is the paradox! - so common in real life, because there are still (and hardly ever) people for whom someone else's success is like a knife in the heart, and many of these people will try to stab the one to whom they verbally honor, present it in the most unfavorable light at every opportunity.

The phrase "broken wings" is metaphorical, as it is completely built on a hidden comparison: broken wings are shattered illusions, the collapse of a dream, parting with former ideals.

“Full confidence” is a metonymy. Of course, it is not confidence itself that has been satiated - we are talking about well-to-do, and therefore confident in their own infallibility, people who propagate their point of view on the rights of the strong. By the way, here I see an allusion - I remember the Russian proverb: "The well-fed does not understand the hungry."

The hyperbole “a million is exchanged for a ruble” from the last stanza emphasizes the dislike of the lyrical hero for everything unnatural, ostentatious (“I don’t like arenas and arenas”).

A characteristic feature of the poem "I do not love" is the presence of ellipses. By the term ellipsis, we mean a rhetorical figure of a colloquial style, which is a deliberate omission of words that are not essential for the meaning: I do not like when - half; Or - when all the time against the wool, / Or - when with iron on glass. This technique gives the poem a certain democracy, which is enhanced, firstly, by the use of colloquial phraseological units to climb into the soul, spit into the soul (I don’t like when they climb into my soul, / Especially when they spit in it, and secondly, by using phraseologism of high style - the worm of doubt - in an unexpected perspective, in the plural: worms of doubt, which reduces its loftiness and reduces it to a colloquial style, and, thirdly, the inclusion of colloquial words in the text: for good reason, slander, a million.

Vysotsky's poem "I don't love" consists of 8 quatrains with a cross rhyme in each, and in the first and third lines of each stanza the rhyme is female, and in the second and fourth - male. The poem is written in iambic pentameter, which has an extra syllable in lines with feminine rhyme.

Since there are a lot of polysyllabic words in the work (fatal, open, enthusiasm, half, etc.), and the property of Russian vocabulary is that each word has one stress, then poetic lines without pyrrhic (feet that do not have a stressed syllable) in it a little - three (When a stranger reads my letters; It's annoying to me that the word "honor" is forgotten; It's a shame to me when the innocent are beaten). In the remaining lines, one pyrrhic and two pyrrhic.

The poem "I do not love", in my opinion, is a program work then, at the time of creation, still a young poet. Vysotsky already at the age of 30 knew for sure that he would not be able to accept, fall in love under any circumstances, with which he intended to fight both with the help of his poems and songs, and with the help of his roles in theater and cinema. He knew and loudly declared it.

"I do not like"

Optimistic in spirit and very categorical in content, the poem by B.C. Vysotsky "I do not love" is a program in his work. Six of the eight stanzas begin with the phrase “I don’t love,” and in total this repetition sounds eleven times in the text, ending with an even sharper denial “I will never love this.”

What can the lyrical hero of the poem never be able to put up with? What vital phenomena does he deny with such force? All of them characterize him in one way or another. Firstly, it is death, a fatal outcome, which is difficult for any living being to come to terms with, life's hardships that make one distract from creativity.

The hero also does not believe in unnaturalness in the manifestation of human feelings (be it cynicism or enthusiasm). Strongly hurts his interference in his personal life. This theme is metaphorically emphasized by the lines (“When a stranger reads my letters, looking over my shoulder”).

In the fourth chapter, gossip hated by the hero is mentioned in the form of versions, and in the fifth he exclaims: "It's a shame to me, since the word "honor" is forgotten and if in honor there are slander behind the eyes." There is a hint here Stalin era when, on false denunciations, they went to their death, they were imprisoned, they were sent to camps or to an eternal settlement of innocent people. This theme is also emphasized in the next stanza, where the lyrical hero declares that he does not like "violence and impotence." The idea is emphasized by the images of "broken wings" and "crucified Christ".

Some thoughts throughout the text of the poem are repeated to one degree or another. The work is thus saturated with criticism of social disharmony.

The well-fed confidence of some is combined with the broken wings (that is, the fates) of other people. At B.C. Vysotsky, on the other hand, always had a heightened sense of social justice: he instantly noticed any violence and impotence around him, for he himself felt them when he was not given permission to perform in concert for a long time. Creative inspiration gave wings to new achievements, and numerous prohibitions broke these wings. Suffice it to note the fact that the poet, who left such an extensive creative heritage, did not publish a single collection of poetry during his lifetime. What justice to B.C. Can Vysotsky speak after that? However, the poet did not feel himself inwardly in the camp of the weak, those innocents who are being beaten. He also experienced the burden of popular love and fame when his songs became popular, when people tried their best to get a ticket to the Taganka Theater to meet B.C. Vysotsky as an actor. B.C. Vysotsky understood what an attractive power this glory possesses, and the image of the needle of honors in the fourth stanza of the poem eloquently testifies to this.

In the final stanza, another remarkable image appears - “arenas and arenas”. It symbolizes the attempts of all kinds of hypocrisy in society, when "a million is exchanged for a ruble", that is, they are exchanged for a small amount in the name of some false values.

The poem “I don’t love” can be called a life program, following which a person is able to maintain such qualities as honesty, decency, the ability to respect himself and maintain the respect of other people.

In the poem “I don’t love,” V. Vysotsky talks about his principles. He boldly expresses his position, even if it does not correspond to the generally accepted one. The poet does this with the help of a personal “I”, which sounds in almost every line. Vladimir Semyonovich was accustomed to go to the end and fully express himself, not to leave everything unsaid. He does not know the feeling of cowardice.

Vysotsky is categorical in his statements and will not tolerate objections. The great poet expresses his civic position, while not using beautiful phrases and sweet-sounding epithets. Vysotsky was not used to adjusting to someone else's opinion, he always had his own thoughts. The poem shows an unshakable belief in one's own rightness, and for him it is the truth.

What can a poet never come to terms with? First of all, this is a fatal outcome - death and hardships that distract from creativity. Secondly, he cannot come to terms with when they climb into his personal life, and he also does not like gossip and when they discuss behind his back.

All claims of Vladimir Semenovich are clear and understandable. He chose to stand up for his opinion rather than succumb to a changing world. Reading this poem, we understand the feelings and inner mood of the author.

Analysis of the poem I do not love according to plan

Perhaps you will be interested

• Analysis of Akhmatova's poem Love

  Anna Akhmatova, a poetess who wrote poems about earthly love. Her sparkling piercing lines about this complex feeling fill her whole life. At the same time, the language is understandable to anyone, because every person on Earth

• Analysis of Mayakovsky's poem Jubilee

  The name of the poem "Jubilee" is associated with the year of writing - 1924, that is, with the 125th anniversary of the birth of A.S. Pushkin. It is to this poet that Mayakovsky refers in his monologue

• Analysis of the poem Blessed is the gentle poet Nekrasov

  This poem is part of Nekrasov's satirical and civic lyrics. Here, of course, questions are raised about the purpose of the poet.

• Analysis of the poem Bad weather - autumn - smoke Feta

  In 1850 Fet published his second collection. The book itself consists of the cycle "The Blues", where the author included three works. In each of them, the author describes and considers the feeling when the soul is completely empty.

• Analysis of Tyutchev's poem Dawn Grade 5

  A poem by Fyodor Ivanovich called "Dawn" was published in 1849. It is bright, filled with positive emotions, a little inviting.